Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is double-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
Editorial
Section | Editorial |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | Unstructured (250 words) |
Word Limit | 1500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 10 |
Tables | NA |
Figures | NA |
Authors | 2 |
Policies / Guidelines | Introduction, Body and Conclusion. Introduction: An Introduction of explanation of issue, especially complex issues. Body: Opinions from the opposing viewpoint that refute directly the same issues the author addresses. The opinions of the author delivered in a professional manner. Good editorials engage issues, not personalities and refrain from name-calling or other petty tactics of persuasion. Alternative solutions to the problem or issue being criticized. Anyone can gripe about a problem, but a good editorial should take a proactive approach to making the situation better by using constructive criticism and giving solutions. Conclusion: A solid and concise conclusion that powerfully summarizes the author's opinion. Give it some punch. |
Continued Medical Education
Section | CME |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | NA |
Word Limit | 3500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 20 |
Tables | ± 1 |
Figures | ±1 |
Authors | 2 |
Policies / Guidelines | In-depth, substantiated, educational articles presenting core information for the continuing professional development. |
Review Article
Section | Review Article |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | Un / Structured (Background, Aims & Objectives, Material & Methods, Results, Conclusion) – 200 words only. |
Word Limit | 3000 |
References (PubMed Only) | 50 |
Tables | ± 2 |
Figures | ±2 |
Authors | 6 |
Policies / Guidelines | Review articles would be preferably by invitation, written by individuals who have done substantial work on the subject or are considered experts in the field. Articles by other public health experts can be accepted on the basis of merit of article. A short summary of the work done by the contributor(s) in the field of review/their area of expertise should accompany the manuscript. The section titles would depend upon the topic reviewed. Authors submitting review articles should include a section describing the methods used for locating, selecting, extracting, and synthesizing data. The journal expects the contributors to give post-publication updates on the subject of review. The update should be brief, covering the advances in the field after the publication of the article and should be sent as a letter to the editor, as and when major development occurs in the field. |
Original Article
Section | Original Article |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | Required |
Abstract | Structured (Background, Aims & Objectives, Material & Methods, Results, Conclusion) – 200 words only. |
Word Limit | 3500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 25 |
Tables | 4 |
Figures | 4 |
Authors | 6 |
Policies / Guidelines | These include population-based surveys, program evaluations, impact assessment studies, randomized controlled trials, intervention studies, studies of screening and diagnostic tests, outcome studies, cost effectiveness analyses, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, cohort studies and case-control studies. Should be divided into sections IMRAD Introduction: Brief and relevant not more than 200 words Aims & Objectives: Preferably in points Material & Methods: Sub Headings: Study Type, Study Population, Study Area, Study Duration, Sample Size calculation, Inclusion Criteria, Exclusion Criteria, Strategy for collection, Working Definition, Ethical Approval, Consent, Data Analysis - Software, Flow Diagram Required Results: Avoid duplication of information i.e. Text vs tables Discussion: Quote only relevant study of last five years’ duration Conclusion: Check does they match with the set objectives Recommendation: Public health importance Limitation of the study: If any Relevance of the study: What it adds to the current knowledge Authors Contribution: How each author contributed in this study as per the signed contributor form Acknowledgement: If Any References: Vancouver Style only – PubMed preferred, in case on url please mention Accessed on dd/mm/yy) |
These include population based surveys, program evaluations, impact assessment studies, randomized controlled trials, intervention studies, studies of screening and diagnostic test, outcome studies, cost effectiveness analyses, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, cohort studies and case-control studies,. The text of original articles amounting to up to 3500 words (excluding Abstract, references and Tables) should be divided into sections with the headings Abstract, Key-words, Introduction, Material and Methods, Results, Discussion, References, Tables and Figure legends.
Abstract should be structured, not more than 250 words, briefly mentioning background, objectives, methods, results and conclusion.
Introduction: State the purpose and summarize the rationale for the study or observation.
Materials and Methods: It should include and describe the following aspects:
Ethics:
The journal will not consider any paper which is ethically unacceptable. A statement on ethics committee permission and ethical practices must be included in all research articles under the ‘Materials and Methods’ section When reporting studies on human beings, indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional or regional) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (available at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17-c_e.html). For prospective studies involving human participants, authors are expected to mention about approval of (regional/ national/ institutional or independent) Ethics Committee or Review Board, obtaining informed consent from adult research participants and obtaining assent for children aged over 7 years participating in the trial. The age beyond which assent would be required could vary as per regional and/ or national guidelines. Ensure confidentiality of subjects by desisting from mentioning participants’ names, initials or hospital numbers, especially in illustrative material. When reporting experiments on animals, indicate whether the institution’s or a national research council’s guide for, or any national law on the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.
The ethical standards of experiments must be in accordance with the guidelines provided by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) and World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Humans for studies involving experimental animals and human beings,respectively).
Study design:
Selection and Description of Participants: Describe your selection of the observational or experimental participants (healthy people, patients or laboratory animals, including controls) clearly, including eligibility and exclusion criteria and a description of the source population. Technical information: Identify the methods, apparatus (give the manufacturer's name and address in parentheses), and procedures in sufficient detail to allow other workers to reproduce the results. Give references to established methods, including statistical methods (see below); provide references and brief descriptions for methods that have been published but are not well known; describe new or substantially modified methods, give reasons for using them, and evaluate their limitations. Identify precisely all drugs and chemicals used, including generic name(s), dose(s), and route(s) of administration.
Reports of randomized clinical trials should present information on all major study elements, including the protocol, assignment of interventions (methods of randomization, concealment of allocation to treatment groups), and the method of masking (blinding), based on the CONSORT Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org).
Reporting Guidelines for Specific Study Designs
Initiative | Type of Study | Source |
CONSORT | Randomized controlled trials | http://www.consort-statement.org |
STARD | Studies of diagnostic accuracy | http://www.consort-statement.org/stardstatement.htm |
QUOROM | Systematic reviews and meta-analyses | http://www.consort- statement.org/Initiatives/MOOSE/moose.pdf statement.org/Initiatives/MOOSE/moose.pdf |
STROBE | Observational studies in epidemiology | http://www.strobe-statement.org |
MOOSE | Meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology | http://www.consort- statement.org/Initiatives/MOOSE/moose.pdf |
Statistics:
Whenever possible quantify findings and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (such as confidence intervals). Authors should report losses to observation (such as, dropouts from a clinical trial). When data are summarized in the Results section, specify the statistical methods used to analyze them. Avoid non-technical uses of technical terms in statistics, such as 'random' (which implies a randomizing device), 'normal', 'significant', 'correlations', and 'sample'. Define statistical terms, abbreviations, and most symbols. Specify the computer software used. Use upper italics (P 0.048). For all P values include the exact value and not less than 0.05 or 0.001. Mean differences in continuous variables, proportions in categorical variables and relative risks including odds ratios and hazard ratios should be accompanied by their confidence intervals.
Results: Present your results in a logical sequence in the text, tables, and illustrations, giving the main or most important findings first. Do not repeat in the text all the data in the tables or illustrations; emphasize or summarize only important observations. Extra- or supplementary materials and technical detail can be placed in an appendix where it will be accessible but will not interrupt the flow of the text; alternatively, it can be published only in the electronic version of the journal.
When data are summarized in the Results section, give numeric results not only as derivatives (for example, percentages) but also as the absolute numbers from which the derivatives were calculated, and specify the statistical methods used to analyze them. Restrict tables and figures to those needed to explain the argument of the paper and to assess its support. Restrict the number of figures and tables below four. Use graphs as an alternative to tables with many entries; do not duplicate data in graphs and tables. Where scientifically appropriate, analyses of the data by variables such as age and sex should be included.
Discussion: Include summary of key findings (primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, results as they relate to a prior hypothesis); Strengths and limitations of the study (study question, study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation); Interpretation and implications in the context of the totality of evidence (is there a systematic review to refer to, if not, could one be reasonably done here and now?, what this study adds to the available evidence, effects on patient care and health policy, possible mechanisms); Controversies raised by this study; and Future research directions (for this particular research collaboration, underlying mechanisms, clinical research).
Do not repeat in detail data or other material given in the Introduction or the Results section. In particular, contributors should avoid making statements on economic benefits and costs unless their manuscript includes economic data and analyses. Avoid claiming priority and alluding to work that has not been completed. New hypotheses may be stated if needed, however they should be clearly labeled as such. About 25 references can be included.
These articles generally should not have more than six authors.
Short Article
Section | Short Article |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | Required |
Abstract | Un/Structured (Background, Aims & Objectives, Material & Methods, Results, Conclusion) – 100 words only. |
Word Limit | 1500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 10 |
Tables | ± 1 |
Figures | ±1 |
Authors | 6 |
Policies / Guidelines | Short article should contain interesting observations/ brief reports of original studies presenting the authors' views on a topic of current interest. The purpose of a short article in Indian Journal of Community Health is to provide additional insights into topics of current public health concerns. A summary and recommendations in end of 100 words. |
Field Report
Section | Field Report |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | NA |
Word Limit | 1500 |
References (PubMed Only) | ± 5 |
Tables | NA |
Figures | NA |
Authors | 2 |
Policies / Guidelines | This should be from the experts who are directly involved in the field. The authors should have first-hand experience. Appropriate permissions should be obtained. The field experience can have data or it can be a consolidated qualitative report too. This should be an example for other places to work on in future. Multiple experiences in a qualitative approach can be introduced as a report. Not storytelling but experience sharing qualitative or quantitative. A summary in end of 100 words. It is good to give references and links for further study if required. |
Perspective
Section | Perspective |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | Yes Un / Structured (Background, Aims & Objectives, Material & Methods, Results, Conclusion) – 200 words only. |
Word Limit | 1500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 5 |
Tables | ±1 |
Figures | ±1 |
Authors | 2 |
Policies / Guidelines | This is an expected article from the experts in the field who have researched on already had evidence and derived the contents which have been used or will be used and its relevance with public health importance. This is taken from the people who are currently working with problems or have experienced disasters. There should be a summary in the end and final say of the perspective. |
Commentary
Section | Commentary |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | Yes Unstructured - 100 Words only. Structured - (Background, Aims & Objectives, Material & Methods, Results, Conclusion) – 100 words only. |
Word Limit | 1500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 05-Oct |
Tables | ±1 |
Figures | ±1 |
Authors | 4 |
Policies / Guidelines | This is an expected article from the experts in the field who have researched on already had evidence and derived the contents which have been used or will be used and its relevance with public health importance. This is taken from the people who are currently working with problems or have experienced disasters. The experience and rationale of the authors will make a mark here and try to bring better learning for future. A summary in end of 100 words with final say of the perspective. |
Letter to Editor
Section | Letter to Editor |
Contributor Form | Required |
Ethical Approval | NA |
Abstract | NA |
Word Limit | 500 |
References (PubMed Only) | 5 |
Tables | NA |
Figures | NA |
Authors | 2 |
Policies / Guidelines | These should be short and decisive observations. They should preferably be related to articles previously published in the Journal or views expressed in the journal. They should not be preliminary observations that need a later paper for validation. |
PG Thesis (IAPSM Member) Submission
New Submission Open only for IAPSM Member PG Residents from their Thesis
Dear PG Residents,
Kindly refer to given weblink for submission guidelines.
https://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/about/submissions
Ensure you submit your articles as per submission guidelines only and mention your IAPSM Membership Number in Title Page.
Four files to be uploaded:
1. Title Page
2. Contributor Form
3. Ethical Approval
4. Manuscript
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.