Profile of various congenital anomalies in fetus detected during antenatal period among high risk mothers by Ultrasonography at Tertiary Care Centre, South Gujarat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2024.v36i01.007Keywords:
Congenital Anomaly, Ultrasonography, High Risk Pregnant WomenAbstract
Background: With the improvement of basic maternal and child health care services, the deaths due to malnutrition and infections are on a descending trend and due to westernization and lifestyle modifications, perinatal deaths due to anomalies are in ascending trend. Aim & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to estimate the antenatal proportion of congenital anomalies, types, pattern of anomalies and factors associated with anomalies in Tertiary Care Centre, South Gujarat. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study in Department of Fetal Medicine of New Civil Hospital, Surat. Methods and Material: Sample size was 435. First 10 consecutive high-risk ANC patients, who were referred to Fetal Medicine department from Obstetrics and Gynecology department per day were selected. Data was collected during September 2021 to February 2022. Statistical analysis used: Frequencies, proportions and tests of significance was applied for testing the association of socio-demographic variables, clinical variables etc on presence or absence of congenital anomalies. Results: Proportion of different types of congenital anomalies in high risk pregnant mother was 17.2%. There was significant association between presence of congenital anomalies with history of irregular menstruation (p value: 0.001, OR: 5.19, [CI: 1.76-15.27]) and inadequate amniotic fluid (p value: 0.00, OR: 14.5[CI: 7.23-29.06]). Among total detected anomalies in Ultrasonography scanning, most common anomalies were Cardio-vascular system anomalies (36.4%) and Central Nervous System anomalies (24%). Conclusions: Congenital anomalies were present in about 17 % of high risk antenatal mothers.
Downloads
References
Congenital disorders. [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
Sallout B, Obedat N, Shakeel F, Mansoor A, Walker M, Al-Badr A. Prevalence of major congenital anomalies at King Fahad Medical City in Saudi Arabia: a tertiary care centre-based study. Ann Saudi Med. 2015;35(5):343–51.
Biswas T. India launches programme for child-health screening. The Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):e8.
Bhide P, Gund P, Kar A. Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in an Indian Maternal Cohort: Healthcare, Prevention, and Surveillance Implications. PLoS ONE. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166408.
NFHS-5_Phase-II_0.pdf. [cited 2023 Feb 20]. Available from: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/NFHS-5_Phase-II_0.pdf
Sunitha T, Rebekah Prasoona K, Muni Kumari T, Srinadh B, Laxmi Naga Deepika M, Aruna R, et al. Risk factors for congenital anomalies in high risk pregnant women: A large study from South India. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2017;18(1):79–85.
Akinmoladun JA, Famosaya ID, Ogbole GI. Pattern and distribution of prenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies among high risk pregnant women in Ibadan, South Western Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41:66.
Shrestha S, Shrestha A. Prevalence of Congenital Malformations among Babies Delivered at a Tertiary Care Hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58(225):310–3.
Marwah S, Sharma S, Kaur H, Gupta M, Goraya SPS. Surveillance of congenital malformations and their possible risk factors in a teaching hospital in Punjab. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(1):162–7.
Pattern of Congenital Anomalies at Birth: A Hospital-based Study [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.jsafog.com/abstractArticleContentBrowse/JSAFOG/18106/JPJ/fullText
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hiteshri Patel, Utsavi Desai, Mohamed Anas Mohamed Faruk, J K Kosambiya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.