Evaluation of quality certification programs for public health facilities in tribal villages of Dahod district, Gujarat: A Qualitative study
Keywords:
Quality Certification Programs, Tribal and Rural Health, Public Health FacilitiesAbstract
Background: Rural and tribal India poses significant challenges in addressing healthcare quality. Along with healthcare staff, beneficiaries’ perspectives nowadays play a crucial role. The Government Health system has started to implement various quality certification programs (QCPs) like National Quality Assurance Standards, Kayakalp etc. on a wider scale. So, it’s very crucial to measure the results and evaluate the impact of these QCPs on the health system. Thus, this present study was designed to find out the impact made by these QCPs. Aims & Objective: To investigate the impact of quality certification programs for public health facilities in tribal villages. Material and methods: A qualitative study was undertaken in 18 PHCs of one of the tribal blocks of Dahod district. The participants were selected using purposive sampling. The participants included staff working at healthcare facilities and patients who have availed services at those facilities. Qualitative data was collected using in-person in-depth interviews (IDI). A total of 19 health staff and 23 patient IDIs were conducted. The audio recording was done for the interviews. Later on, process of transcribed verbatim and manual thematic analysis was done. Result: The transcripts’ manual thematic analysis part produced 12 different categories, 6 different sub-themes and 3 major themes, while the staff part, yielded 16 different categories, 6 different sub-themes and 3 major themes. Beneficiaries were satisfied with a noticeable improvement in healthcare services. Staff found these programs helpful but predominantly raised concerns about the implementation of QCPs. Conclusion: QCPs have demonstrated a significant positive impact on healthcare services; it's very promising specifically in the context of rural and tribal health facilities. These programs hold great promise as they enable and empower these facilities to achieve quality and higher standards with the availability of better care.
Downloads
References
Mohanan M, Hay K, Mor N. Quality Of Health Care In India: Challenges, Priorities, And The Road Ahead. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(10):1753-1758.
National Quality Assurance Standards, National health system resource centre. [online] [Accessed 29 October 2022]. Available from: https://qps.nhsrcindia.org/national-quality-assurance-standards
Kayakalp, National Health Mission. [online] [Accessed 10 November 2022 ]. Available from https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/in-focus/Revised_Kayakalp_Guidelines.pdf
Labour room and quality improvement initiative, National Health Mission. [online] [Accessed 12 November 2022] Available from https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=3&sublinkid=1307&lid=690
Tancred T, Mandu R, Hanson C, Okuga M, Manzi F, Peterson S, Schellenberg J, Waiswa P, Marchant T; EQUIP Study Team. How people-centred health systems can reach the grassroots: experiences implementing community-level quality improvement in rural Tanzania and Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(1):e1-e13.
Das J, Holla A, Das V, Mohanan M, Tabak D, Chan B. In urban and rural India, a standardized patient study showed low levels of provider training and huge quality gaps. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(12):2774-84.
Dongre A, Deshmukh P. Practical Guide: Qualitative Methods in Health and Educational Research. Chennai: Notion Press Media Pvt. Ltd; 2021
Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-44.
van Rijnsoever FJ. (I Can't Get No) Saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sizes in qualitative research. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181689.
Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148.
Boyce, C. and Neale, P. (2006) Conducting In-Depth Interview: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2.
Vimal M, Dongre AR, Nishanthi A, Kagne RN. Student support system for medical undergraduates: A qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:150.
Dossett LA, Kaji AH, Cochran A. SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(9):875-876.
Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(2):34-5.
Enablers and Barriers of NQAS Certification of Hospitals in Kerala, PRC Report Series 2019-20: 2 [online] [Accessed 25 October 2022]. Available from: https://qps.nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/Report%20on%20Enablers%20and%20Barriers%20of%20NQAS%20accreditation%20of%20Hospitals_%20PRC%20Kerala.PDF
Level of Implementation of KAYAKALP in PHCs of Karnataka and its Impact, PRA Dharwad, March 2020. [online] [Accessed 10 November 2022]. Available from: https://qps.nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/PRC%20Dharwad_KAYAKALP-Karnataka_0.pdf
Assessing the reasons for poor performance of Public Health Facilities in Tamil Nadu, in Kayakalp Award , PRA Tamilnadu, February 2020. [online] [Accessed 12 November 2022]. Available from: https://qps.nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/PRC%20Gandhigram_Kayakalp%20Assessment%20in%20Tamil%20Nadu.pdf
Narang R. Measuring perceived quality of measuring quality health care services in India. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(2):171-86.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bankim Gandhi, Dr. Dinesh Bhanderi, Dr. Hemshree Parmar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
