Quantifying the mobile phone usage and gauging the perception about its harmful effects among the Otorhinolaryngologists in India- A questionnaire-based pan India survey


  • Prem Anand All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar
  • Saurabh Varshney All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar
  • Sumit Angral All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar
  • KSBS Krishna Sasanka All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar
  • Pratima Gupta All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar
  • Sudip Bhattacharya All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-9013




Mobile Health, Health, Radiation, Cancer


Introduction-There is a definitive risk to human health because of mobile phones. The awareness towards mobile phones emitted electromagnetic radiation is of paramount importance to prevent health risks and possible negative health disorders. Aim and objectives-The aim of the survey is to assess the awareness of mobile phone radiation and its harmful effects on the body and the mobile phone usage trend among Otorhinolaryngologists from India. Methodology-The present survey aimed to obtain baseline data on cell phone usage and radiation awareness among a relatively homogenous cohort of Otorhinolaryngologists from India. This is a cross-sectional online survey assessing awareness of Mobile Phone radiation through a custom-made questionnaire devised by the authors which consisted of four parts: 1. Demographic details, 2. Mobile phone usage trend, 3. Knowledge of mobile phone radiation 4. Awareness of health hazards produced by mobile phone radiation. Results- The total number (n) of otorhinolaryngologists to whom the questionnaire was sent was 6336 of which 259 of them responded which formed the sample size of our study. Thus, the response rate of the survey was 4%. A total of 259 Otorhinolaryngologists participated in the study. The mean age of the population involved in the survey is 41.7810.32 years. The male-female ratio of the survey is 161:98 respectively. There were 172 private and 87 government ENT practitioners in the survey. MS otorhinolaryngology was the most common qualification of the study with 223 doctors having the degree, 20 having DNB, and 7 of them having completed DLO. The mean years of medical practice after postgraduation of the Otorhinolaryngologists participating in the questionnaire are 13.537.38 years. The major contributors to the survey were private ENT consultants with a count of 110, followed by Senior Residents 58, Assistant Professor 39, Professor 29, Associate professor 10, and Additional professor 13. It was evident from the questionnaire that 242 of the respondents were right-handed and 204 of the study population used their right ear for talking over the phone, it was also cross-checked by giving a miss call to them in close vicinity. The mean years of exposure to mobile phone usage by Otorhinolaryngologists are 15.01 5.75. A maximum of 153 surgeons were using mobile phones for 11-20 yrs. The average hours of daily mobile phone usage were 373 minutes. A highest of 101 Otorhinolaryngologists using mobile phones for >4 Hrs. Surprisingly through the questionnaire we came to know that a total of 60 doctors among the 250 use the phone daily for an average of more than 10 Hrs, which is 24% of the study population surveyed. Questions 15-24 were purposed to bring the awareness knowledge of the respondents towards electromagnetic radiation of the cellular phones and it can be arbitrarily said that a score of 5 or more means that the person is aware. The average of the correct responses to each of the 10 questions given by the ENT practitioners is 5.97±1.66. Similarly, questions 25 to 35 assess the awareness of health hazards produced by mobile phone radiation. The mean correct response of the Otorhinolaryngologists is 6.30±1.87.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sudip Bhattacharya, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar

Assistant Professor


BBc. The man who invented mobile phone [Internet]. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/8639 590.stm

wikipedia. Statistics in India.

NDTV. mobile usage trend in India. Available from: https://gadgets.ndtv.com/mobiles/news/over-500-million-indians-now-use-smartphones-77-percent-of-who-are-online-techarc-2172219

Statista. smartphone usage in Inida. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1229799/india-smartphone-penetration-rate/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1229799/india-smartphone-penetration-rate/. smart phone penetration in India. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1229799/india-smartphone-penetration-rate/

Hansson Mild K, Carlberg M, Wilén J HL. How to combine the use of different mobile and cordless telephones in epidemiological studies on brain tumours? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005;14(285):8.

Pawl R. Cell phones more dangerous than cigarettes! Surg Neurol. 2008;70(445):6.

Agarwal A. Cell Phones and their Impact on Male Fertility: Fact or Fiction. Open Reprod Sci J. 2011;3(1):125–37.

Roelandts R. Cellular phones and the skin. Dermatology. 2003;207(1):3–5.

World Health Organization. IARC Classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Robert F. CJ, Sylvar DM, Ulcek JL. Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. FCC OET Bull 65. 1997;(August):1–79.

Habash RWY. Bioeffects and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic energy. Boca Rat CRC Press. 2008;

Deepinder F, Makker K, Agarwal A. Cell phones and male infertility: Dissecting the relationship. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(3):266–70.

Davey S, Davey A. Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian adolescents: A mixed method study by systematic-review and meta-analysis approach. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(12):1500–11.

Dagli R, Hans R. Effect of mobile phone radiations on oral health. J Int oral Heal JIOH. 2015;7(1):i–ii. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709374%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4336668

Souza LDCM, Cerqueira EDMM, Meireles JRC. Assessment of nuclear abnormalities in exfoliated cells from the oral epithelium of mobile phone users. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(2):98–102.

Dasdag, S., I. Yavuz and MZA. Effects of radiofrequencies emitted from mobile phones on teeth and oral tissues. Int Dent Med Res. 2017;10(176):78.

Hansson Mild K, Hardell L, Kundi M MM. Mobile telephones and cancer: Is there really no evidence of an association? Int J Mol Med. 2003;12(67):72.

Bayazit V, Bayram B, Pala Z AO. Evaluation of carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF). Mehic B Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 4(331):245–50.

Röösli M, Lagorio S, Schoemaker MJ, Schüz J, Feychting M. Brain and Salivary Gland Tumors and Mobile Phone Use: Evaluating the Evidence from Various Epidemiological Study Designs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:221–38.

Yu G, Bai Z, Song C, Cheng Q, Wang G, Tang Z, et al. Current progress on the effect of mobile phone radiation on sperm quality: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of human and animal studies. Environ Pollut. 2021;282:116952. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116952

Rago R, Salacone P, Caponecchia L, Sebastianelli A, Marcucci I, Calogero AE, et al. The semen quality of the mobile phone users. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013;36(11):970–4.

Kramarenko A V., Tan U. Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: A brain mapping study. Int J Neurosci. 2003;113(7):1007–19.

D’Costa H, Trueman G, Tang L, Abdel-Rahman U, Abdel-Rahman W, Ong K, et al. Human brain wave activity during exposure to radiofrequency field emissions from mobile phones. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2003;26(4):162–7




How to Cite

Anand P, Varshney S, Angral S, Sasanka KK, Gupta P, Bhattacharya S. Quantifying the mobile phone usage and gauging the perception about its harmful effects among the Otorhinolaryngologists in India- A questionnaire-based pan India survey. Indian J Community Health [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 31 [cited 2023 Sep. 24];34(4):542-8. Available from: https://iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/article/view/2475



Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>